True story: Last month I sold my Nikon 14-24mm f/2.8G, locally through craigslist and purchased a mint Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8G the very next day, using the same load of cash I received for my wide angle. I've used the ultrawide maybe three times total. It bothers me that there's no filter ring for me to drop my three-stop neutral density filter onto. Also I'm not much of a landscape guy.
As you recall, I traded away my 24-70 and 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II away earlier this year and boy, I regret and miss the versatility of those lenses while I shot my last event, which was a wedding.
I came armed to the teeth with primes all the way up to 200mm! Even though I had two DSLRs on my Blackrapid harness, carrying a wide and tele, it was a pain having to swap lenses so often to get that range I wanted. I "zoomed" a lot more with my feet therefore, exerting more energy than I had to. Granted I lost 30 lbs. in 8 months and in the best shape of my life, ever. After a few hours I was completely exhausted, much like how I felt on my last post.
Re-attaining the 24-70 once again, will indeed make my life a lot easier. I could easily slap this on my D3x as my wide/group portrait lens and my tele of choice on the D700 for high iso candids. It's indeed a game changer. Some of you may wonder 'why not the new 24-120 f4?' It's plain and simple, while I love the extra versatility, I do not like f4. I love shallow depth of field, it's my bread and butter. It's what draws potential clients to my services. The 24-120 f4 would be a wonderful vacation walkaround lens. The 24-70 f2.8 is absolutely sharp corner to corner and since it has a 9 blade aperture, the out of focus areas are incredible. I'm glad to have this lens back in my arsenal.
Wednesday, August 25, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment